Legal Opinion

Rainier National Bank v. Security State Bank

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 10, 1990No. 12444-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J. *

Security State Bank appeals from a summary judgment determining that plantation grown Christmas trees are not "crops" pursuant to RCW 62A.9 (U.C.C. Article 9) but rather that Christmas trees are part of the realty. The trial court then held that Rainier National Bank had a perfected security interest prior to Security State Bank's security interest. Security State Bank argues that Christmas trees are crops and that its perfected security interest should take priority. We agree with Security State Bank, and reverse.

On January 2, 1981, Fred and Evelyn Wall leased property in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lipsett Steel Products, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Grogan v. Harvest Capital Co. (In re Grogan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. In Re Temple Stephens Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
  4. Lambert v. KysarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Lambert v. KysarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API