Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Lackawanna Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Patrick Quinlan* from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant,- entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 19th day of November, 1904, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Erie Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Stover, J.:

" The action is negligence. Plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant engaged in operating a crane by electricity. Plaintiff had operated the crane for an hour or two, beginning at seven o’clock in the morning, on the day- of the accident. While operating the crane his position was in a cage at one side of the crane. Just before the accident he left his position in the cage and went upon the carriage of the crane, to oil some portion of the machinery. In doing so he passed upon the top of' one of the girders and near the' drums which carried the cables operating the crane. While…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cashman v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heffron v. Lackawanna Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Hope v. Soranton & Lehigh Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Bannon v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Guilmartin v. Solvay Process Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Hess v. FurstAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API