Legal Opinion

Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crane, Ch. J.

This appeal involves the same question as that presented in its companion case, Matter of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McGoldrick (279 N. Y. 184). Should the principles there stated lead to a different result on the facts in this case?

The Standard Oil Company, having numerous oil tanks in New Jersey, by New York contract sold and delivered oil to the respondent’s steamships at its piers in New York city. A tax upon these sales for the period from December 10, 1934, to December 31, 1935, has been set aside below, as an illegal burden upon interstate commerce. The only distinction upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Sears, Roebuck Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. McGoldrick v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Trotwood Trailers, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. DuGrenier v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. American Molasses Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API