Legal Opinion

Winfield Lumber Co. v. Southern Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1923No. 7 Div. 399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcOLELLAN, J.

The appeal is by the Winfield Lumber Company, an intervening, asserted relatively, superior lienor of the proceeds of the sale (under decree) of certain property in Gadsden. The court, in one aspect of the decree, denied the relief the appellant sought. There is no note of testimony as required by chancery rule 75, Civil Code, p. 1551. In the absence of note of testimony, a decree will not be reversed where the decree concludes in denial of the appealing actor’s right to relief. Watson v. Kirkland, 204 Ala. 655, 87 South. 93; Beck v. Burchfield, 205 Ala. 486, 88 South. 417; Saxon v. Parson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brassell v. BrassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Saxon v. ParsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Beck v. BurchfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Watson v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Conner v. State Ex Rel. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Huguley v. HuguleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Boswell v. LongshoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API