Legal Opinion
State v. Hodges
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 10, 1979No. 78-58 C, CA 12465PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, P. J.
The defendant appeals his conviction of arson of his house and of the intentional murder of his wife by means of the same arson of his house. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. MOTION TO SUPPRESS SEIZED EVIDENCE
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized at the defendant’s house. His challenge is in two parts: He argues (1) that the affidavit upon which the search warrant was based 1 fails to show probable cause to believe a crime had been committed on the premises searched (defendant’s home) or that evidence of crime would be found there, and (2)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreibergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. ParrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991