Union Trust Co. v. Kendall
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho District Court. All necessary facts and questions are fully presented in the subjoined opinion. The district court gave judgment in favor of Kendall, at the July Term 1877, and the Trust Company, defendant, brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by for the killing of a cow. There are probably two substantial questions in the case: one, whether the plaintiff in error can be made liable at all under the provisions of said law, and the other, as to the sufficiency of the demand. Of these in their order. The first appears upon the face of the bill of
Brewer, J.:
statement of the case. This was an action under the laws of 1874, particulars. The action was commenced in a justice’s court. The bill of particulars was entitled, as to the parties, “William A. Kendall, plaintiff, vs. .The Union Trust Company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tracy v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Illinois Central Railroad v. KanouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Webb v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
- Rogers v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bradford Construction Co. v. HeflinMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880