Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Lint

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LLOYD, J.

On August 7, 1934, Lowell L. Baldwin and Thomas G. Kugeman, stockholders in The City Auto Stamping Company, as plaintiffs, commenced an action in the Court of Com- moil Pleas of Lucas County against Amos Lint and other officers and directors of the company, and by an amended petition thereafter filed made the company a party defendant thereto. The basic claim of the plaintiffs Baldwin and Kugeman was that the defendant officers and directors had been guilty of “misfeasance, malfeasance and non-feasance” in the several respects stated in the amended petition as to a contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox v. CoxOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Greenlee v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API