Legal Opinion

State v. Hurlbert

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1925No. 26,132PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Defendant was convicted of the felony denounced in R. S. 21-907. The proof showed that defendant had committed this abomination with an eleven-year-old boy, serving alternately as actor and catamite, as Zeus and Ganymede.

The sole error urged is that the evidence which proved a penetration per os was not sufficient to sustain a conviction. It is argued that the statute is an inheritance of the common law, where carnal penetration per anum was the particular form of abomination which shocked the sensibilities of our forefathers and fell into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kinnan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bancroft v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BaddersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. State v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  4. State v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API