Legal Opinion

Grushlaw v. Phœnix Knitting Works

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 26, 1910No. 1,437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Suit in equity by the Phoenix Knitting Works against Samuel Grushlaw, individually and trading under the name and style of the Pennsylvania Knitting Mills, and also under the style of Penn Muffler Company. From an order granting a preliminary injunction (181 Fed. 166), defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, granting a preliminary injunction for' infringement of design patent No. 39,347, issued June 9, 1908, to one Mead, for a neck scarf. Some time prior to the entry of the order allowing a preliminary injunction in the court below, the patent in suit had been sustained by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, in Phoenix Knitting Works v. Bradley Knitting Company et al., 181 Fed. 163. It now appears that the defendant in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phœnix Knitting Works v. Bradley Knitting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Desmond Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  2. Phœnix Knitting Works v. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Atlas Specialty Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  4. Phœnix Knitting Works v. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API