Legal Opinion
Construction Services in Samoa Inc. v. American Samoa Government
High Court of American Samoa
Decided November 23, 2005No. CA No. 41-03Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Introduction
On March 16, 2001, plaintiff Construction Services In Samoa ("CSS") entered into a construction contract with defendant American Samoa Government, Department of Port Administration ("ASG"). In short, the contract required CSS to complete the third and final phase ("Phase III") of a dock rehabilitation project ("the project") in the Pago Pago Harbor.1 Although Phase III involved erecting a small guardhouse, a fence, and some drainage causeways, the vast majority of work (roughly 70-80%) involved pouring and finishing a concrete dock in the Pago Pago port.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Gautier v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.