Legal Opinion

Halperin v. Pitts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 2011No. C064436CV; A139639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants appeal a judgment quieting title to a disputed strip of land in plaintiffs and dismissing defendants’ trespass counterclaim, raising five assignments of error. We write to address only one of defendants’ assignments of error — viz., that the trial court erred in dismissing defendants’ counterclaim for trespass against plaintiff Michel on the ground that her intrusion onto defendants’ land was so trivial that she could not be liable for trespass — and reject the others without discussion. We agree with defendants that the trial court erred in dismissing defendants’ counterclaim for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Knight v. NyaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Fountain Village Development v. Weiner Investment Co. (In Re Fountain Village Development )United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  3. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API