Commonwealth v. Bey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.,
Opinion by
'The magistrate’s record was brought before a court of common pleas of Philadelphia county by a writ of certiorari. This appeal by defendant is from the judgment of that court, which sustained the summary conviction by the magistrate.
The question here presented is whether the magistrate’s transcript of the record is sufficient. Defendant’s argument is to the effect that the record fails to set forth any of the evidence, or the substance of the evidence, and that this is fatal to the validity of the proceedings.
The complaint, as disclosed by the transcript of the record,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BordenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Commonwealth v. GinsbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. McCannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Commonwealth v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. OliverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. DeCarloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hewitt v. BetoffPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1953
- Commonwealth ex rel. Jones v. HendrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. Banovich, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.