Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haynes v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1931No. 20661Published

1DissentBell, J.

I am constrained to dissent from the judgment of reversal, for two reasons: first, because I think the evidence shows as a matter of law that the plaintiff did not rely upon any representation which the defendant may have made to him regarding the value and collectibility of the notes. On the other hand, it affirmatively appears from the evidence that the plaintiff, before he signed any sort of contract, concluded to make an independent investigation with regard to the same subject. Upon this question *827lie testified as follows: “After I had my conversation with Mr. Cannon [the defendant] and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Sawyer v. BirrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Richardson v. DuPreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API