Legal Opinion
J. E. Faltin Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Eazor Express, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 10, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 16521PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
In this case, tried to the court without a jury, the plaintiff seeks to recover damages flowing from the defendant’s alleged breach of a contract styled as a “Trailer Interchange Agreement”.
The court makes the following:
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New Hampshire, and is a citizen of New Hampshire and the United States of America.
2. Defendant is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of Pennsylvania and is doing business in the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Lauman v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Penneys v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- American Enka Company, in No. 82-1080 v. Wicaco MacHine Corp. American Enka Company v. Wicaco MacHine Corp., in No. 82-1109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Beechwoods Flying Service, Inc. v. Al Hamilton Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- J. E. Faltin Motor Transportation, Inc., a Corporation v. Eazor Express, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Lichter v. Mellon-Stuart CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.