Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Fishman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1925No. 11,162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

On the- application by plaintiffs in error to have their writ of error made a supersedeas the defendants in error, as their first step, and without discussing the merits, seasonably interposed their objection thereto solely on the ground that the writ of error was improvidently issued. Their objection is equivalent to, and is to be considered as, a motion to dismiss the writ upon the ground that it does not lie in this case. This is not an ordinary law action or suit in equity. It was instituted under a statute of the state passed in 1907 to establish disputed corners and boundaries of land.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. LandisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. Miller v. BuyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cortvriendt v. CortvriendtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Putnam Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Hook v. VogtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API