Legal Opinion

Worthy Siders, Jr. v. Ohio River Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 26, 1972No. 71-1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court denying appellant Si-ders’ claim for “maintenance and cure.” The district court, in a well-written opinion, 351 F.Supp. 987, held that appellant did not prove that he had become mentally or physically ill in any substantial way while on appellee’s ship. The court found alternatively that appellant could be denied recovery because during his pre-employment physical, he wilfully concealed information about his prior poor health.

Appellant presents three grounds for reversal:

1) the district court’s findings of fact and…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. David McCorpen v. Central Gulf Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Siders v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Francis A. Deisler v. McCormack Aggregates, Co. Dredge "Sandy Hook", Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Plummer v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Coughenour v. Campbell Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Dillon v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Siders v. Ohio River Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API