Worthy Siders, Jr. v. Ohio River Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court denying appellant Si-ders’ claim for “maintenance and cure.” The district court, in a well-written opinion, 351 F.Supp. 987, held that appellant did not prove that he had become mentally or physically ill in any substantial way while on appellee’s ship. The court found alternatively that appellant could be denied recovery because during his pre-employment physical, he wilfully concealed information about his prior poor health.
Appellant presents three grounds for reversal:
1) the district court’s findings of fact and…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- David McCorpen v. Central Gulf Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Siders v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
4Cited by8 opinions
- Francis A. Deisler v. McCormack Aggregates, Co. Dredge "Sandy Hook", Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Plummer v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Coughenour v. Campbell Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dillon v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Siders v. Ohio River Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.