Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor Vehicles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
By assignment of error number one, plaintiff contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff willfully refused to submit to the breathalyzer test. Plaintiff argues that his refusal to take the test cannot be considered willful because it resulted not from any intentional act on his part but rather as a result of his accidentally allowing the thirty minute period to elapse while waiting for his attorney to contact him. Plaintiff argues that it is essential for the State to show that he was made aware of the passage of time in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Deaner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Goodman v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heles v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- Etheridge v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980