Legal Opinion

Hartung v. Manning

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buttz, District Judge.

In 1922 there was a legal eoutest over the personnel of the state game and fish board. On April 1, 1921, the petitioner was appointed a state-wide deputy game warden by the old board, known as the Bloom-Stucke board. At a meeting of the new board, known as the Manning-Dickinson board, held at Jamestown on *481April 20th, 1922, it was resolved “that all game wardens now working, including chief game wardens and their clerks, be laid oft on the first day of May, 1922,” and that “'the secretary be instructed to notify the several game wardens of the expiration of their terms of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Bank v. MaierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Stavens v. National Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andersen v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. SouthAllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Citizens State Bank v. GeisenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Michigan City Bank v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. North Dakota Game & Fish Department v. BrashearsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API