Grace v. Sutton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to the common pleas of Venango county. This action was by Nimrod B. Grace and Abraham Clark against Reuben York and Reuben Sutton, administrators of Stephen Sutton, deceased, in which the plaintiff filed the following statement:— “ The plaintiffs state their cause of action tobe founded on the ¿^ward hereinafter stated.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the common pleas of Venango county. This action was by Nimrod B. Grace and Abraham Clark against Reuben York and Reuben Sutton, administrators of Stephen Sutton, deceased, in which the plaintiff filed the following statement:— “ The plaintiffs state their cause of action tobe founded on the ¿^ward hereinafter stated. The following is the agreement and award, to wit: “We, Abraham Clark and Nimrod B. Grace, and Reuben York one of the administrators of Stephen Sutton, deceased, do mutually agree to refer all matters and things between the said Clark, Grace, and Sutton, unsettled,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Sergeant, J.
This is an action in which the plaintiff filed a statement claiming against the defendants Reuben York, and Reuben Sutton, administrators of Stephen Sutton, deceased, the amount of a sum awarded by referees. One of these administrators, York, and the plaintiff, by writing under their respective hands and seals, agreed to refer all matters and things between the plaintiffs and the intestate, unsettled, originating from an article of agreement between *542the said parties, for the carpenter work of a brick house in the town of Franklin, to three…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. GiffordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824
- Hoare v. MuloySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1796
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peters's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861