Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Cummiskey, United States of America v. Michael Clark

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 20, 1984No. 83-1280, 83-1284PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

Patrick Cummiskey and Michael Clark appeal from sentencing orders following their convictions for violations of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. § 1513 (1982), and for conspiracy to violate the Act, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982). These appeals raise two principal issues for our consideration: whether the district

court improperly admitted comments on the defendants’ silence, in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); and whether the indictment properly charged offenses under sections 1513 and 371.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena VilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson, A/K/A Gexex JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Ronald Paradis, United States of America v. Norman Beliveau, United States of America v. Christine BeliveauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API