Legal Opinion
People v. Redman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 5, 1981No. Crim. 38291PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.
Appellants Redman and Rodney Jerome Overstreet were jointly charged in count I with robbery, in violation of Penal Code section 211. Count I further alleged that in the commission and attempted commission of the robbery, a principal was armed with a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022, subdivision (a). In addition, each of the appellants was alleged in count I to have personally used a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.5 during the commission and attempted commission of the robbery.
Appellant Redman was also alleged to have been…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kirkpatrick v. Aline D.California Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
- Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. LeeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. Luisa Z.California Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.