Legal Opinion

Aliff v. Vervent, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 26, 2025No. 3:20-cv-00697Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No.: 20-cv-697-DMS-AHG HEATHER TURRY, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 14 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS OF SUIT, AND SERVICE 15 VERVENT, INC., etc., et al. AWARDS 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, costs of suit, and 20 service awards for class representatives. (Motion, ECF No. 357). Defendants filed a 21 response in opposition, (Opp’n, ECF No. 370), and Plaintiffs filed a reply. (Reply, ECF 22 No. 372). The motion is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API