Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Vap v. Diamond Oil Producers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1983No. 55,204Published

1ConcurrenceFotii, C.J.

My concurrence in the result in this case is based on defendant’s failure to seek a stay of execution under K.S.A. 60-262(b) when it could have done so without cost. I do not wish to be understood as saying that a judgment debtor who does not post a supersedeas bond thereby acquiesces in the judgment or forfeits the right to appeal. Many judgment debtors lack the financial resources to prevent execution in this way. Mere inaction is ordinarily not acquiescence.

Payment of the judgment is another matter. It appears that under Kansas law payment to the sheriff who is about to execute does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muckey v. BaehrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Feight v. WyandtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Hermesch v. HaverkampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API