Berman v. LaRose
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcG-begob, P. J.
The present dispute presents the question of whether a commercial landowner owes a duty to business invitees to keep abutting state-owned property, used for public parking, in a reasonably safe condition. The particular fact situation involved, that of a publicly-owned parking area abutting defendant’s premises, to our knowledge has not been presented to the American judiciary. The merits of the question will be weighed as presented by the following fact situation: ■
Defendant owns a retail grocery store and his customers often park their cars on a strip of state-owned land between the road…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weider v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Levendoski v. GeisenhaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Robertson v. Liggett Drug Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- City of Detroit v. ChaffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Abeles v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ward v. Frank’s Nursery & Crafts, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Mendyk v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Stevens v. DrekichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ziginow v. Redford JayceesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.