State v. Patterson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶1 Defendant Cory R. Patterson challenges his conviction on one count of object rape, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He does not challenge his convictions on two counts of forcible sexual' abuse, stemming from the same incident. We conclude that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient for the jury to find every element of object rape, and we therefore affirm,
¶2 When -we review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we review thé evidence and all inferences that may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ShumwayUtah Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- People v. RiosenSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- People of Guam v. Joseph Marc Thomas Duenas Castro, Jr., aka Joseph Marc Castro, Jr., aka Joseph Mark Thomas Duenas Castro Jr., aka Joseph Mark Castro, Jr., aka Joseph M.T.D. Castro, aka JoeySupreme Court of Guam · 2025
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.