Legal Opinion
In re Rosenblatt
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1924No. 10555PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarvin, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This is an application by the trustee in bankruptcy for leave to reargue a motion (heretofore granted) to confirm a report of a special commissioner. The trustee relies upon Matter of Murcott Steel Products Co.,. 2 Am. Bankr. Rep.' (N. S.) 153, 294 Fed. 84, and Mobile Chair Mfg. Co. (D. C.) 245 Fed. 211, in addition to other authorities cited. The former decision holds that d clause in a mortgage, whereby the mortgagor promises to pay “all charges touching the same and the keeping and sale thereof,” does not justify a construction that it was intended to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ackerman v. . HunsickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Gugel v. New Orleans Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
- In re Locust Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In Re Gotham Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Estes v. E. B. Estes & SonsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- In re CichanowiczDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- In re SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.