Legal Opinion

Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided October 7, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

Suit for infringement of patent No. 491,113, granted February 7, 1893, to Karl Hutter, for a bottle stopper, and patent No. 25,435, granted April 28, 1896, to Karl Hutter, tor a design for a bottle stopper. All of the issues in this case, so far as they concern the validity of the patents, have been considered, upon practically the same evidence as to the same infringing devices, and with the same expert testimony, by the circuit court in the Third circuit, in the case of Hutter v. Broome, 114 Fed. 655. *191After a careful examination of the patents, defendants’ evidence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutter v. BroomeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902
  2. Municipal Signal Co. v. National Electrical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  3. Municipal Signal Co. v. National Electrical Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. SetlowDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API