Legal Opinion

People v. Planes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, we find no error in the jury instructions on the agency defense given by the court. The record reveals that the trial court presented a balanced *482charge and explained the fundamental law on the defense of agency.

As to the defendant’s other contention, we find that the closure of the courtroom was proper. While we are mindful of the strong policy considerations inherent in the right to a public trial, this right may give way, at times, to more compelling interests. In the present case, the record details the careful consideration the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. ContinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. SchinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API