Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stamadianos v. Stamadianos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1986No. Docket 74171Published

1DissentLevin, J.

The question that is the subject matter of the opinion of the Court is whether the ten-day county residency provision* 1 is jurisdictional. If it is, then the failure of Eugenia Stamadianos to have resided in Livingston County for at least ten days immediately preceding the filing of her complaint might require that the consent default judgment of divorce be set aside.

i

Leave to appeal was granted because the decision of the Court of Appeals was seen as conflicting with a decision rendered by another panel of *15the Court of Appeals in a different case and with this Court’s opinion in Lehman v…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lehman v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Gunn v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Abadi v. AbadiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Zahorsky v. ZahorskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API