Legal Opinion

Harry Roff and Marcia Roff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 4, 1962No. 13873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Taxpayer in good faith sold to a third party two annuity contracts shortly before their maturity. He contends that the excess of sales price over net cost should be taxed at capital gains rates. The Tax Court, in an excellent opinion by Judge Bruce, upheld the Commissioner’s finding that the sales resulted in ordinary income to the petitioner. We must agree.

Admittedly petitioner’s gain arises from the fixed interest on the annuities. He would have been taxed on that gain as ordinary income had the contracts been surrendered or after their maturity. Section 72, Internal Revenue Code of 1954,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Arnfeld v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Bodine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Hallcraft Homes, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  3. Edwin A. Gallun and Jane W. Gallun (Formerly Husband and Wife) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  4. First National Bank of Kansas City v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Jones v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API