Legal Opinion
Swedish Crucible Steel Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 23, 1974No. Civ. A. 36646PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Swedish Crucible Steel Company, conducts a plastics and foundry manufacturing business at a location in Hamtramck, Michigan. The complex includes eight buildings, designated serially. Buildings 2 through 8 are used in the plastics division primarily. Building 1 is used as the foundry, but some molds, dies and patterns for the foundry were stored in Building 2. Buildings 1 and 2 are separated by an alley 20 feet…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Cottrill v. Michigan Hospital ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Kingsley v. American Central Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Sump v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Topolewski v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Marys Foundry, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1996
- Dictiomatic, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997