City of Dawson v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Dawson — Judge Edwards. April 20, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
The petition alleged that the plaintiff was a lineman for a telephone company. He was an electrician by trade, or proposed to become an electrician. Also it was alleged that he had no expert knowledge of electricity. He was nineteen years old, was earning $2 per day, and was injured by contact with a wire conveying electricity from the plant owned and operated by the city of Dawson, which wire was strung on the pole of the telephone company, and was wholly without insulation, “the. insula*604tion on same having been entirely worn off.” By an amendment he struck the words within the quotation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbus Railroad v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Olds-Oakland Co. v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Dorsey v. Columbus RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- Columbus Power Co. v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Carruthers v. City of HawkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- City of Sylvania v. NeesmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Dollar v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919