Legal Opinion

Smith v. McMicken

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1846Published

Appeal from the District Court of West Feliciana, Johnson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

The facts of this case are these : It appears that, in December, 1839, Peyroux, Arcueil & Co., having sued Charles C. S. Farrar and his wife, Mary A. Farrar, for the recovery of a certain sum of money, judgments were confessed by each of the defendants respectively in favor of the plaintiffs, in the following manner; to wit: the husband confessed judgment for the sum of $8031 40, with interest, and the wife confessed judgment for the sum of $8402 13, also with interest; whereupon regular judgments were rendered and signed accordingly.

On the 31st of August, 1843, Peyroux, Arcueil & Co., being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skillman v. PurnellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. Maher v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API