Legal Opinion

Dodd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1946No. 23258Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant earnestly insists that we erred in holding that the trial court did not err in failing to charge on the law of circumstantial evidence. We have again reviewed the. record in the light of the appellant’s motion, but see no reason for receding from the conclusion reached as stated in the original opinion.

It is the settled rule in this state that a charge on circumstantial evidence is not required if there is proof that the deceased, either as a part of a dying declaration or as a part of the res gestae, stated that the defendant shot him.

In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Polk and Watts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API