Legal Opinion
Pfeffer v. Lehmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 21, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
The order appealed from in part directs the city treasurer to pay over money to make good a loss resulting from an act of his predecessor in office. It is made in an action in which the infant recovered judgment against a tort feasor. Presumably it is made under section 137 of the Civil Practice Act.
The city treasurer challenges the order on two grounds: (1) That assuming the moneys were improperly invested by his predecessor, petitioner may not have relief on a motion in the original action; (2) that in any event the moneys were not improperly invested.
If the first contention be determined…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Chesterman v. . EylandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Gray v. . Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- County of Tompkins v. IngersollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Youngs v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the William M. Kline Revocable TrustNew York Surrogate's Court · 2003
- City of New York v. BuckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Matter of PorgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1939