Rolling v. Hockenberry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
In support of his motion to dismiss this appeal for appellant’s failure to have filed a transcript of the record within the time prescribed by law, respondent has filed the certificate of the county clerk in accordance with the *310provisions of rule VI of the Rules for the Supreme Court and • District Courts of Appeal. The facts stated in the certificate are uncontradicted. It appears therefrom that notice of appeal was filed on December 24, 1934; that on the same date notice was filed with the county clerk to prepare a transcript of the record to be used on appeal; that no transcript has been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bales v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Capley v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ciani v. Dubuque F. & M. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934