Tax Collector v. Stettinger
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant Karyn Stettinger1 appeals following the trial court’s denial of her motion *824to open the judgment of foreclosure by sale, claiming that the court improperly denied her motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. The defendant was the owner of a certain piece of property at 198 Frank Street in New Haven. The plaintiff, the tax collector of the city of New Haven, determined that property taxes had not been paid and thereafter commenced an action to foreclose the tax hens. Abode service…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Divito v. DivitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Collins v. ScholzConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Garden Mutual Benefit Assn. v. LevyConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
- Knutson Mortgage Corp. v. BernierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Argent Mortgage Co. v. HuertasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Fine Homebuilders, Inc. v. PerroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Jimenez v. DeRosaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.