Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1997No. 21021PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

Charles B. Smith (movant) was convicted following pleas of guilty to attempted forcible rape and forcible sodomy. §§ 566.030 and 566.060, RSMo Supp.1993. He thereafter filed a motion for post-conviction relief as permitted by Rule 24.035. Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of that motion.

The sentences to which movant’s motion is directed were imposed June 30, 1995. His Rule 24.035 motion was filed October 4,1995. The state asserts movant waived his claim for post-conviction relief because his Rule 24.035 motion was not timely filed.

Because movant’s sentences were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Lestourgeon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. McCoo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Suman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Newman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Dodd Jackson, Jr., Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API