Riley v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Petitioners Patrick Riley and Terry Miller were separately arraigned before Magis trate George Peck in the district court on the Kenai Peninsula. 1 Petitioners were informed of their rights at that time, including the right of peremptory challenge for any judge assigned to their case. In keeping with the practice of the Kenai district court, trial judge assignments were also made at the arraignment. 2
Neither petitioner had the benefit of counsel at his arraignment. The court appointed the Public Defender Agency to represent petitioners. Notice of appointment was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Gieffels v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Pope v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Tunley v. Municipality of Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Morgan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
- Larson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.