Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1980No. 4672PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Petitioners Patrick Riley and Terry Miller were separately arraigned before Magis trate George Peck in the district court on the Kenai Peninsula. 1 Petitioners were informed of their rights at that time, including the right of peremptory challenge for any judge assigned to their case. In keeping with the practice of the Kenai district court, trial judge assignments were also made at the arraignment. 2

Neither petitioner had the benefit of counsel at his arraignment. The court appointed the Public Defender Agency to represent petitioners. Notice of appointment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gieffels v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pope v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tunley v. Municipality of Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Morgan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  5. Larson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API