Legal Opinion
Sirantoine v. ILL. EMPLOYERS INS.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 11, 1983No. 83-474PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
438 So.2d 985 (1983)
Maurice SIRANTOINE and Pierette Sirantoine, Individually and As Husband and Wife, Appellants,
v.
ILLINOIS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, Appellee.
No. 83-474.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 11, 1983.
Wolfson & Diamond, P.A., Miami Beach, and Robert Polsky, Miami, for appellants.
Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson & Kniskern, P.A., and John W. Wylie, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
We reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment for the Sirantoines upon a holding that an excess insurer must offer…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- First State Ins. Co. v. StubbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Thorney v. CloughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4Cited by3 opinions
- Ferreiro v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Spira v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- William Diffin, Individually, and Betty Diffin, His Wife v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Caryl Anthony Vaughn GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985