Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Mitskevich v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1967Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, J. (dissenting).

The admittedly unwitnessed fall of the decedent made applicable the presumption under section 21 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and while I do not agree with the interpretation of the facts as outlined in the majority opinion, or the method adopted in making applicable the presumption, a line of decisional law seems to suggest that an award, if properly made, can be affirmed in this case. (See Matter of Hoffman v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 290 N. Y. 277; Matter of Sleator v. National City Bank, 285 App. Div. 393; Matter of Moraes v. National Biscuit Co., 2 A D 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Hoffman v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Claim of Sleator v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API