Legal Opinion

Wilson v. First Nat. Bank of Miami

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1939No. 28635PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

It is contended upon two grounds that the trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s answer.

In connection with the first question presented here, we recite the following facts;

Plaintiff in error, Wilson, on May 9, 1935, obtained a judgment against one Merriam, who was then the owner of the land involved herein; the judgment was indexed on the judgment docket under the name of other judgment debtors, hut was not so indexed under Merriam’s name; subsequently defendant in error, bank, obtained a deed to the property from Merriam with no actual knowledge of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dabney v. HathawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Richards v. TynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. C. M. Keys & Co. v. First National Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. EtterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Citizens Nat. Bank in OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API