Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bartkus v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1959No. 1Published

1Dissent

*150Mr. Justice Black, with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas concur,

dissenting.

Petitioner, Bartkus, was indicted in a United States District. Court for bank robbery. He was tried by a jury and acquitted. So far as appears the trial was conducted fairly by an able and conscientious judge. Later, Bartkus was indicted in an Illinois state court for the same bank robbery. This time he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. His acquittal in the federal court would have barred a second trial in any court of the United States because of the provision in the Fifth Amendment that…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API