Carven v. Hickman
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KRAUSER, Judge.
The issue presented by this case is whether the statute of repose, Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 5-108 of the Maryland Code Annotated (1973, 1998 Repl.Vol.), bars a claim against an owner developer who, after allegedly removing the headstones from his family graveyard, sold it, as part of a residential lot, without notifying the purchasers of its existence or removing the graves or their occupants. The ultimate and unwitting purchasers of that lot were appellants, Thomas and Deborah Carven.
In 1986, appellants built their home on the lot in question, and in 1995 they…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- O'BRIEN v. Hazelet & ErdalMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ray & Sons Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- North American Specialty Insurance v. Boston Medical GroupCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Hickman v. CarvenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.