Legal Opinion

Steadfast Building & Loan Ass'n v. Ploski

New Jersey Circuit Court

Decided January 5, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, C. C. J.

(Orally.) The court was asked to allow an order and rule for judgment in each of the above named three separate ejectment actions, but before so doing the court requested counsel to serve a notice of such application for order and rule on each of the defendants, attaching to the said notice copy of proposed order and rule. This was done. The defendants did not appear.

The situation in each of these three cases is identical. There is an action by the mortgagee against the mortgagor for ejectment, upon default in the mortgage, as set forth in the complaint, for possession of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Del-New Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Mershon v. CastreeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API