Legal Opinion

United States v. CAROLINA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH NETWORK, PA

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided February 1, 2021No. 1:16-cv-00234Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. CYNTHIA SMITH and ) MELANIE CHILDRESS ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:16cv234 ) CAROLINA COMPREHENSIVE ) HEALTH NETWORK, PA, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on a request to seal by the United States (Docket Entry 52) (the “Motion to Seal”). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion to Seal. INTRODUCTION Asserting violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), Cynthia Smith and Melanie Childress (the “Relators”)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. In Re the Knight Publishing Company D/B/A the Charlotte ObserverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API