Legal Opinion

State v. Matheson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 2004No. 02-1743PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue in this appeal from a criminal sentencing is exceptionally narrow. Impact statements by victims of an out-of-state crime should not have been admitted into evidence. The State contends the error in admitting them was harmless and thus does not require reversal. We conclude the error was not harmless and therefore reverse and remand. So doing, we vacate a contrary determination by the court of appeals.

The underlying facts are as outrageous and ominous as they are bizarre. Defendant, Robert Benjamin Matheson, worked at a plant in Spirit Lake where he assaulted three women. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SailerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Jasper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. State v. AshleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. SumpterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. TeschSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. State of Iowa v. Carlos Ariel Gomez GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Mickael Clemann v. Iowa District Court for Scott CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. Errol Edward DeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API