Legal Opinion

Little Nell Gold Mining Co. v. Hemby

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1909No. 5475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Teller District Court—Hon. Wm. P. Seeds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error and two others, as defendants, to recover for work performed by the plaintiff and four others, for the defendants, in a mine operated under a lease. The four others referred to assigned their claims to plaintiff. The allegations of the complaint, necessary to be referred to, as contained in the first cause of action are as follows:

“Third. That on the 29th day of March, 1900, plaintiff commenced work for the defendants at their *583request as a miner, and continued in said employment for the period of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beers v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Soden v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crandall Realty & Securities Co. v. TanquaryColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Crandall Realty & Securities Co. v. TanquaryColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API