Hanna v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are (1) plaintiffs motion to remand and (2) defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, the court (1) denies plaintiffs motion to remand and (2) grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are taken from plaintiffs complaint and are assumed to be true for the purposes of defendant’s motion to dismiss. On April 12, 2000, defendant City of Chicago (the “City”) adopted city-wide height limitations on residential properties zoned R4 and R5 (the “Height…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.