Legal Opinion

Brick v. Freehold National Banking Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1875Published

On rule to show cause why verdict for plaintiffs should not be set aside and new trial granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dalrimple, J.

The defendant in this case is sued as endorser of a promissory note. The defence is, that the plaintiffs, the holders of the note, received from the maker a conveyance of certain property as collateral security for the payment of the note, and that because of their failure to sell the collaterals and appropriate the proceeds of the sale to the liquidation of the debt, coupled with the fact that the property held as collateral, had somewhat depreciated in value, between the time of the maturity of the note and the commencement of the suit,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schroeppel v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API